Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
Major - P3
-
None
-
2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2
-
None
-
None
-
Linux 3.1.6 on x86_64, gcc version 4.5.3 (Gentoo 4.5.3-r1 p1.0, pie-0.4.5), manual compilation with no system libraries
-
Linux
Description
The following error is triggered when compiling the MongoDB backend for PowerDNS:
In file included from /usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/jsobj.h:41:0,
|
from /usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/sock.h:25,
|
from /usr/include/mongo/client/../util/message.h:20,
|
from /usr/include/mongo/client/dbclient.h:24,
|
from mongodbbackend.hh:10,
|
from mongodbbackend.cc:18:
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h: At global scope:
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h:793:98: error: expected ',' or '...' before '&' token
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h: In function 'mongo::BSONObjBuilder& mongo::_appendIt(mongo::BSONObjBuilder&, const mongo::StringData&, const mongo::theL (*)())':
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h:796:23: error: expected nested-name-specifier before 'theL'
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h:796:23: error: expected '(' before 'theL'
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h:796:23: error: expected ';' before 'theL'
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h:796:59: error: 'i' was not declared in this scope
|
/usr/include/mongo/client/../util/../util/../db/../bson/bsonobjbuilder.h:796:64: error: 'vals' was not declared in this scope
|
i've bisected the code between 1.9.0 and 2.0.0 and found the following bad commit:
|
|
1cc69e30ad84a166ac1d48f68b20efa52c40fcc8 is the first bad commit
|
commit 1cc69e30ad84a166ac1d48f68b20efa52c40fcc8
|
Author: gregs <greg@10gen.com>
|
Date: Fri Jun 3 17:58:26 2011 -0400
|
|
|
be smarter about the pids we look for when cleaning old locks.
|
unfortunately my C++ skills are very weak and i've no idea what's going on ![]()