[CXX-1265] Audit driver against Max Staleness Spec Created: 20/Mar/17 Updated: 11/Aug/17 Resolved: 02/Jun/17 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | C++ Driver |
| Component/s: | Testing |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 3.2.0-rc0 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | David Golden | Assignee: | Samuel Rossi (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Epic Link: | CXX-1293 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Revalidate driver against: |
| Comments |
| Comment by Samuel Rossi (Inactive) [ 02/Jun/17 ] |
|
We already have a test for setting a positive value less than 90, but we do not have any tests regard the URI option for max staleness, so I've filed |
| Comment by David Golden [ 02/Jun/17 ] |
|
I think we should have tests that verify (if we don't already):
Otherwise, we can rely on the C driver. |
| Comment by Samuel Rossi (Inactive) [ 31/May/17 ] |
|
The max staleness spec describes a number of tests (both prose and JSON). However, all of the functionality described by the spec (with the exception of providing users with a read preference setting for the max staleness in seconds) is implemented in the C driver rather than the C++ driver. david.golden, is it worth implementing the tests for functionality only present in the C driver, or would be prefer to leave this to the C driver itself? |