[CXX-490] Determine if we want inline / template visibility macros Created: 22/Jan/15 Updated: 24/Apr/15 Resolved: 26/Feb/15 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | C++ Driver |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 0.1.0 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Tyler Brock | Assignee: | Adam Midvidy |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Epic Link: | PM-123 | ||||||||
| Comments |
| Comment by Adam Midvidy [ 26/Feb/15 ] |
|
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY - sets type_visibility("default") - this could be useful for classes that have private members, but all public member functions are marked inline. We probably can punt on this one as it's clang only. We should consider revisiting this if gcc adds support for it.' edit - moved the comment about inline visibility to |
| Comment by Adam Midvidy [ 18/Feb/15 ] |
|
we seem to have stumped stackoverflow: |