[CXX-490] Determine if we want inline / template visibility macros Created: 22/Jan/15  Updated: 24/Apr/15  Resolved: 26/Feb/15

Status: Closed
Project: C++ Driver
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 0.1.0

Type: Task Priority: Major - P3
Reporter: Tyler Brock Assignee: Adam Midvidy
Resolution: Won't Fix Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Issue Links:
Related
related to CXX-499 Tag all private methods and types wit... Closed
Epic Link: PM-123

 Comments   
Comment by Adam Midvidy [ 26/Feb/15 ]

_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY - sets type_visibility("default") - this could be useful for classes that have private members, but all public member functions are marked inline. We probably can punt on this one as it's clang only. We should consider revisiting this if gcc adds support for it.'

edit - moved the comment about inline visibility to CXX-489.

Comment by Adam Midvidy [ 18/Feb/15 ]

we seem to have stumped stackoverflow:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28437772/what-does-clangs-type-visibility-attribute-do-and-when-should-one-use-it

Generated at Wed Feb 07 21:59:21 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.7.1#970001-sha1:2222b88b221c4928ef0de3161136cc90c8356a66.