[DOCS-10030] TTL indexes on capped collections - statements seem contradictory Created: 23/Mar/17 Updated: 30/Oct/23 Resolved: 30/Oct/17 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | Server |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Server_Docs_20231030 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Minor - P4 |
| Reporter: | Matt Kalan | Assignee: | Stennie Steneker (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Participants: | |
| Days since reply: | 6 years, 15 weeks, 2 days ago |
| Description |
|
On this page: This should say "As an alternative to capped collections, you could use TTL indexes..." As written, it says for "additional flexibility", which implies you can add it to capped collections, because that is the topic on this page. Then the last line of the section says it can't be used for capped collections, which is confusing |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 30/Oct/17 ] |
|
Author: {'email': 'stennie@cpan.org', 'name': 'Stephen Steneker', 'username': 'stennie'}Message: |
| Comment by Githook User [ 30/Oct/17 ] |
|
Author: {'email': 'stennie@cpan.org', 'name': 'Stephen Steneker', 'username': 'stennie'}Message: |