[DOCS-13648] Investigate changes in SERVER-47495: Ban force reconfig with "newlyAdded" fields Created: 14/May/20 Updated: 13/Nov/23 Resolved: 17/Aug/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | manual, Server |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 4.7.0, Server_Docs_20231030, Server_Docs_20231106, Server_Docs_20231105, Server_Docs_20231113 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Backlog - Core Eng Program Management Team | Assignee: | Joseph Dougherty |
| Resolution: | Gone away | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Days since reply: | 2 years, 25 weeks, 1 day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Epic Link: | DOCSP-15042 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
DescriptionDownstream Change Summary The "newlyAdded" field present in on-disk Replica Set Configs in 4.6 will not be accepted in any reconfig, force or non-force. Description of Linked Ticket This is the outcome of the discussion in Scope of changesImpact to Other DocsMVP (Work and Date)Resources (Scope or Design Docs, Invision, etc.)Here is the Technical Design that specifies the behavior around the newlyAdded fields |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jeffrey Allen [ 17/Aug/21 ] |
|
Gone away as part of naomi.pentrel's work on DOCSP-7679. |
| Comment by Judah Schvimer [ 11/Aug/21 ] |
|
Hi! I don't think any additional documentation is needed. I don't expect users to hit this, and I suspect any documentation here would be more confusing than helpful. alan.zheng, do you agree? |
| Comment by Joseph Dougherty [ 10/Aug/21 ] |
|
Hello judah.schvimer and siyuan.zhou! I see we have a note in the Compatibility Changes for 5.0 informing users: "Configurations that attempt to add a field named newlyAdded will error even if run with { force: true }." Does this issue require additional documentation? If so, what else can we tell users about? Thanks! |