[DOCS-14541] Backup Preparations based on head backups and need to be updated/clarified. Created: 07/Jun/21 Updated: 01/Jul/21 Resolved: 14/Jun/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | Ops Manager |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Joshua Maag | Assignee: | Corry Root |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Σ Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Σ Time Spent: | Not Specified | Time Spent: | Not Specified |
| Σ Original Estimate: | Not Specified | Original Estimate: | Not Specified |
| Sub-Tasks: |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Participants: | ||||||||||||||||
| Days since reply: | 2 years, 31 weeks, 6 days ago | |||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 2 |
| Description |
DescriptionThe documentation talking about 2TB limit for uncompressed is inaccurate. With the new headless backup model, i.e. FCV 4.2+, we are no longer reading the data directly, but pulling the blocks directly from the target node. That means for the newer backup model, the data is compressed and therefore should be based on filesize and not data size.
https://docs.opsmanager.mongodb.com/current/core/backup-preparations/#backup-sizing-recommendation Scope of changesImpact to Other DocsMVP (Work and Date)Resources (Scope or Design Docs, Invision, etc.) |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 01/Jul/21 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'corryroot', 'email': '72401712+corryroot@users.noreply.github.com', 'username': 'corryroot'}Message: (
|
| Comment by Githook User [ 22/Jun/21 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'sarahsimpers', 'email': '82042374+sarahsimpers@users.noreply.github.com', 'username': 'sarahsimpers'}Message: (DOCSP-16061) OM/CM Remove all mentions of personal API keys and redirect the pages (#3781)
Co-authored-by: corryroot <72401712+corryroot@users.noreply.github.com> |
| Comment by Githook User [ 14/Jun/21 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'corryroot', 'email': '72401712+corryroot@users.noreply.github.com', 'username': 'corryroot'}Message: (
|
| Comment by Githook User [ 14/Jun/21 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'corryroot', 'email': '72401712+corryroot@users.noreply.github.com', 'username': 'corryroot'}Message: (
|
| Comment by Githook User [ 14/Jun/21 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'corryroot', 'email': '72401712+corryroot@users.noreply.github.com', 'username': 'corryroot'}Message: (
|
| Comment by Corry Root [ 09/Jun/21 ] |
|
tony.sansone, I updated the backup sizing recommendations to clarify that we're talking about compressed data now. I noticed that uncompressed data was a broken link, but couldn't figure out where it meant to point. I'm also a bit unsure about whether the example should change. Guidance and suggestions very welcome on this one. |