[DOCS-450] Documentation could be clearer on relative disk use on primary & secondary Created: 27/Aug/12 Updated: 08/Nov/12 Resolved: 08/Nov/12 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Trivial - P5 |
| Reporter: | William Zola | Assignee: | Sam Kleinman (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Participants: | |||||
| Days since reply: | 11 years, 14 weeks, 6 days ago | ||||
| Description |
|
In the normal course of replication, it's both normal and common for the primary and secondary nodes to use different amounts of disk space at the OS level. The documentation doesn't mention this. |
| Comments |
| Comment by auto [ 08/Nov/12 ] |
|
Author: {u'date': u'2012-11-08T21:08:28Z', u'email': u'samk@10gen.com', u'name': u'Sam Kleinman'}Message: |