determine storageEngine specificity in docs
(DOCS-4856)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | Server |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 01112017-cleanup |
| Type: | Sub-task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Mark Callaghan | Assignee: | David Storch |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | pull-request | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||
| Days since reply: | 8 years, 39 weeks ago | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Cursor/transaction isolation is more interesting now that we have mmapv1, WiredTiger and RocksDB. Some doc updates have been done: Can we also update the docs to state that WiredTiger uses a snapshot per network call for queries as Dan mentions here? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 21/May/15 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'dstorch', u'name': u'David Storch', u'email': u'david.storch@10gen.com'}Message: Signed-off-by: kay <kay.kim@10gen.com> |
| Comment by Githook User [ 21/May/15 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'dstorch', u'name': u'David Storch', u'email': u'david.storch@10gen.com'}Message: Signed-off-by: kay <kay.kim@10gen.com> |
| Comment by Daniel Pasette (Inactive) [ 03/Apr/15 ] |
|
Hi Mark, |