[DOCS-6510] Update mentions of encryption vendors Created: 02/Nov/15 Updated: 11/Jul/16 Resolved: 06/Apr/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Osmar Olivo | Assignee: | Allison Reinheimer Moore |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Participants: | |
| Days since reply: | 7 years, 45 weeks ago |
| Description |
|
For right now: The Encryption at rest security section explicitly calls out Vormetric Generally speaking we should either explicitly remove sections of the documentation that specifically mentions them by name or add the other certified partners for encryption such as Safenet and server general. Ideally, we just create a "certified encryption vendors" page we redirect to everywhere. We should do a big GREP across the docs base to make sure partner vendors aren't specifically called out in places since it'll make maintenance hard as new vendors crop up. For 3.2 The whole Security section should be reviewed to ensure it covers the new encryption options in 3.2 |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 06/Apr/16 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'schmalliso', u'name': u'Allison Moore', u'email': u'allison.moore@10gen.com'}Message: Signed-off-by: kay <kay.kim@10gen.com> |
| Comment by Sheena Badani [ 10/Mar/16 ] |
|
Allison - I'd prefer to list our certified partners if possible: Vormetric and Safenet/Gemalto. If that is not possible then sure you can link to our partner page - its just hard to find things on there which is my issue. |