[DOCS-9541] Docs for SERVER-23186: readConcerns other than "local" should be rejected on non-replicated collections (like local db) Created: 05/Dec/16 Updated: 30/Oct/23 Resolved: 24/Mar/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Documentation |
| Component/s: | Server |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Server_Docs_20231030 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Emily Hall | Assignee: | Andrew Aldridge |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Days since reply: | 45 weeks, 5 days ago | ||||||||
| Story Points: | 0.5 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Engineering Ticket Description: Oplog entries have the same readConcern visibility as the writes that they represent. For other collections in the local database, non-local readConcerns don't make sense. Other non-replicated collections include:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Sarah Olson [ 24/Mar/23 ] |
|
Closing this out on the grounds that:
Based on this, closing as WON'T DO. Please don't hesitate to give me a shout or to reopen if you disagree. |