[SERVER-10286] TTL on subdocument arrays Created: 22/Jul/13 Updated: 20/Nov/23 Resolved: 20/Nov/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Index Maintenance |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.5.1 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Skylar Graika | Assignee: | Backlog - Storage Execution Team |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 10 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
n/a |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Storage Execution
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | Execution Team 2020-11-30, Execution Team 2020-12-14, Execution Team 2020-12-28, Execution Team 2021-01-11, Execution Team 2021-01-25, Execution Team 2021-02-08, Execution Team 2021-03-08, Execution Team 2021-03-22, Execution Team 2021-04-05, Execution Team 2021-04-19, Execution Team 2021-05-17, Execution Team 2021-06-14, Execution Team 2021-06-28, Execution Team 2021-07-12, Execution Team 2021-07-26, Execution Team 2021-08-09, Execution Team 2021-08-23, Execution Team 2021-09-06, Execution Team 2021-09-20, Execution Team 2021-10-04, Execution Team 2021-10-18 | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Case: | (copied to CRM) | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Hello there, I have implemented a solution that extends upon the current TTL monitor and allows for dynamic expiration times. My solution works in that respect, but now I'm trying to find a way to retain the parent document and just remove the sub-document that was expired. For example, I have a Tag with a sub-document that is an array of Queue. My goal is to maintain the sub-documents using the ttl without deleting the Tag. Is this possible to with embed sub-docs? Referencing? From looking through past support forums I saw that someone had a similar use-case 10 months ago and I know this will crop-up even more so in the future. I look forward to hearing back from you! Cheers! Skylar |
| Comments |
| Comment by Steven Vannelli [ 20/Nov/23 ] |
|
Closing out as Won't Do since there isn't enough product motivation at the moment. |
| Comment by pravin dwiwedi [ 19/Sep/16 ] |
|
I have similar use case. I raised a ticket without seeing this issue so got closed. |