[SERVER-1525] what should happen if you add the member of one replica set to another replica set? Created: 30/Jul/10 Updated: 12/Jul/16 Resolved: 24/Aug/10 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Question | Priority: | Minor - P4 |
| Reporter: | Kristina Chodorow (Inactive) | Assignee: | Dwight Merriman |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
Created a weird test and I'm not sure what it should do. If someone create two sets called "foo" and adds a member of one set to the other set, what should happen? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Dwight Merriman [ 24/Aug/10 ] |
|
i'm going to close this for now unless there is a specific suggestion that should immediately be implemented – maybe a gist showing what goes wrong and comments on what it should be. |
| Comment by Dwight Merriman [ 04/Aug/10 ] |
|
we should report an error. we do not yet, at least not a great error. i think this question can morph into a new feature suggestion which is to have an internal set id set at initiation (objectid) - and we always check that. maybe then set names are optional, not sure. but that would be useful even if human readable set names are mandatory. |