[SERVER-1525] what should happen if you add the member of one replica set to another replica set? Created: 30/Jul/10  Updated: 12/Jul/16  Resolved: 24/Aug/10

Status: Closed
Project: Core Server
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Question Priority: Minor - P4
Reporter: Kristina Chodorow (Inactive) Assignee: Dwight Merriman
Resolution: Done Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Participants:

 Description   

Created a weird test and I'm not sure what it should do.

If someone create two sets called "foo" and adds a member of one set to the other set, what should happen?



 Comments   
Comment by Dwight Merriman [ 24/Aug/10 ]

i'm going to close this for now unless there is a specific suggestion that should immediately be implemented – maybe a gist showing what goes wrong and comments on what it should be.

Comment by Dwight Merriman [ 04/Aug/10 ]

we should report an error.

we do not yet, at least not a great error.

i think this question can morph into a new feature suggestion which is to have an internal set id set at initiation (objectid) - and we always check that.

maybe then set names are optional, not sure. but that would be useful even if human readable set names are mandatory.

Generated at Thu Feb 08 02:57:16 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.7.1#970001-sha1:2222b88b221c4928ef0de3161136cc90c8356a66.