[SERVER-15977] Provide #ADD semantics to benchRun Created: 05/Nov/14 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 11/May/20 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Shell |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.7.8 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Minor - P4 |
| Reporter: | Alvin Richards (Inactive) | Assignee: | Backlog - Server Tooling and Methods (STM) (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | 28qa, benchRun, benchrun-intern, community-team, tig-benchrun | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Server Tooling & Methods
|
||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
h2: Enhancement Want to the ability to add number in order to create a range, for example
This could look something like
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Ryan Timmons [ 11/May/20 ] |
|
Closing as wont-fix to indicate that there is currently no intention of doing this. New performance workloads are advised to be written in genny rather than benchRun. Please re-open if there is priority for this. Perhaps this change could self-service by an appropriate server team if this is necessary rather than having to go thru the STM prioritization queue. |
| Comment by Chung-yen Chang [ 02/Jun/15 ] |
|
This is a nice-to-have feature and will allow us flexibility in creating workloads using the benchRun framework. I am not sure what fix version to put this in for though. For now, I am putting 3.3 required and we can consider moving it depending on how our plates look like. |