[SERVER-18884] Allow $in to be specified in partial index document filter Created: 09/Jun/15 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 02/Oct/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Index Maintenance, Querying |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | J Rassi | Assignee: | Backlog - Query Optimization |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 27 |
| Labels: | storch | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Optimization
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Case: | (copied to CRM) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Users should be able to specify the $in predicate operators as part of a partial index document filter. For example:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by James Wahlin [ 02/Oct/21 ] |
|
Work to support $in within partial indexes has been committed under |
| Comment by Katya Kamenieva [ 05/Apr/21 ] |
|
I edited this one to represent $in and created SERVER-55782 for $regex |
| Comment by Evtim Georgiev [ 02/Apr/21 ] |
|
Could we have the separate issues for $in and $regex logged so we could vote and watch the ones we are interested in? We could definitely use the $in support, that would help us a lot. |
| Comment by Katya Kamenieva [ 10/Nov/20 ] |
|
Keeping this ticket in the backlog. This probably will be split into two separate items: one for $in, one for $regex, with $in having higher priority. |