[SERVER-22777] Move ASAN builds to Arch Created: 19/Feb/16 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 17/Jul/17 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Build, Testing Infrastructure |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Ernie Hershey | Assignee: | Backlog - Build Team (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Build
|
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
Ubuntu 14.10 is EOL and we can run with new enough versions of everything on Arch. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Ramon Fernandez Marina [ 17/Jul/17 ] |
|
ASAN builders were upgraded to Ubuntu 16.04 long ago, closing ticket. |
| Comment by Ernie Hershey [ 24/Feb/16 ] |
|
We haven't defined yet how Arch updates will work but I think it will be "lurching" more than "rolling," and on-demand until we implement automated image updates from Evergreen. At that point it would be fully rolling, updating on every commit to the packer github repo, which come in batches around once per week. I put this ticket in at Sam's request who can make a better case for it than me, possibly. I think unless the goals of the ASAN builder include testing new clang versions, we should just use a sufficiently new non-arch image. |
| Comment by Andrew Morrow (Inactive) [ 20/Feb/16 ] |
|
I'm generally in favor of the idea, however, I have two questions/concerns:
I'm not sure those are real enough problems to warrant not doing this. An alternative to consider would be to wait a few months until Ubuntu 16.04 which is the new LTS and move ASAN there. |