[SERVER-2320] lsn used in writetodatafiles, and shouldn't be Created: 03/Jan/11 Updated: 12/Jul/16 Resolved: 09/Jan/11 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 1.7.5 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Blocker - P1 |
| Reporter: | Dwight Merriman | Assignee: | Mathias Stearn |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Operating System: | ALL |
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
this code is running: if( _lastDataSyncedFromLastRun > i.seqNumber() + ExtraKeepTimeMs ) { log() << "recover skipping application of section " << i.seqNumber() << " < lsn:" << _lastDataSyncedFromLastRun << endl; } |
| Comments |
| Comment by auto [ 09/Jan/11 ] |
|
Author: {u'login': u'dwight', u'name': u'dwight', u'email': u'dwight@10gen.com'}Message: |
| Comment by Dwight Merriman [ 03/Jan/11 ] |
|
actually, it looks like it logs that but doesn't skip anything. hmmm. |