[SERVER-24354] sys-perf: Change to more consistent naming between Evergreen and its yaml files Created: 02/Jun/16 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 17/Oct/16 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Performance |
| Affects Version/s: | 3.3.6 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Henrik Ingo (Inactive) | Assignee: | Backlog - Performance Team |
| Resolution: | Incomplete | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | DP20_overflow, sys-perf-refactor | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Product Performance
|
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
As part of Distributed Performance 2.0, we should clean up and be more consistent, and adhere to our own specs, wrt naming of the Evergreen projects themselves, as well as the modules of the sys-perf project. Consistency in naming things between Evergreen project name and corresponding yaml file (see last page, left column) Assumption in the first spec is that it is not possible / convenient to change the name of the Evergreen project, so the proposal is to change the name of yml file name. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Ian Whalen (Inactive) [ 17/Oct/16 ] |
|
Name changes will happen as each separate part of the code base is worked on. |
| Comment by Henrik Ingo (Inactive) [ 28/Jul/16 ] |
|
The degree to which one allows an implementation to deviate from the agreed spec is of course a matter of personal taste, but either way, I've added DP20_overflow label instead. |
| Comment by Chung-yen Chang [ 28/Jul/16 ] |
|
I don't know why I gave Ian We should keep this open but I would drop it from the epic though. The naming change does not affect the functionality and can be done at a later point. We need to get the project wrap up and start focusing on regression monitoring soon and can come back to work on this after we get 3.4 in good shape. |
| Comment by Ian Whalen (Inactive) [ 26/Jul/16 ] |
|
Hmmm, yeah, you'll have to ask chung-yen.chang what he meant - I was merely the fingers here |
| Comment by Henrik Ingo (Inactive) [ 26/Jul/16 ] |
|
ian.whalen: You didn't elaborate much, but from what I can see |
| Comment by Ian Whalen (Inactive) [ 23/Jun/16 ] |
|
superseded by |