[SERVER-30478] Add replset test for rename during init sync Created: 02/Aug/17  Updated: 30/Oct/23  Resolved: 28/Aug/17

Status: Closed
Project: Core Server
Component/s: Replication, Storage
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 3.5.13

Type: Bug Priority: Major - P3
Reporter: Geert Bosch Assignee: Geert Bosch
Resolution: Fixed Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Issue Links:
Problem/Incident
causes SERVER-30869 Use a failpoint to make replsets/init... Closed
Related
related to SERVER-4941 collection rename may not replicate /... Closed
Backwards Compatibility: Fully Compatible
Operating System: ALL
Sprint: Storage 2017-09-11
Participants:

 Description   

This is inspired by SERVER-4941. While renaming collections during initial sync may cause a resync currently, that doesn't preclude testing that scenario. A test performing a single rename should result in at most one resync. After SERVER-4941 is implemented, initial sync should be possible in a single attempt.



 Comments   
Comment by Githook User [ 28/Aug/17 ]

Author:

{'username': 'GeertBosch', 'name': 'Geert Bosch', 'email': 'geert@mongodb.com'}

Message: SERVER-30478 New test for rename during initial sync
Branch: master
https://github.com/mongodb/mongo/commit/78862314349a5daeeff213ce22b2d81105e7e5e8

Comment by Ramon Fernandez Marina [ 24/Aug/17 ]

Author:

{'username': u'GeertBosch', 'name': u'Geert Bosch', 'email': u'geert@mongodb.com'}

Message:SERVER-30478 New test for rename during initial sync
Branch:master
https://github.com/mongodb/mongo/commit/c13fc3f7b63c279927e8d9c1d9251631c1d85069

Comment by Ramon Fernandez Marina [ 24/Aug/17 ]

Author:

{'username': u'GeertBosch', 'name': u'Geert Bosch', 'email': u'geert@mongodb.com'}

Message:Revert "SERVER-30478 New test for rename during initial sync"

This reverts commit c13fc3f7b63c279927e8d9c1d9251631c1d85069.
Branch:master
https://github.com/mongodb/mongo/commit/eae3f8ccfa4dacf1f92b31d60281ba60c4fa5462

Comment by Ian Whalen (Inactive) [ 07/Aug/17 ]

Ack. With Geert out I'd like milkie to confirm before I change anything.

Comment by Spencer Brody (Inactive) [ 07/Aug/17 ]

ian.whalen, I think this should be 3.5 Required not desired, otherwise we have no way to know whether the UUID project was successful at meeting its goals.

Generated at Thu Feb 08 04:23:57 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.7.1#970001-sha1:2222b88b221c4928ef0de3161136cc90c8356a66.