[SERVER-31666] catchup_takeover_one_high_priority should use initiateWithAnyNodeAsPrimary Created: 20/Oct/17 Updated: 30/Oct/23 Resolved: 17/Feb/18 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Replication |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 3.6.4, 3.7.3 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Matthew Russotto | Assignee: | Vesselina Ratcheva (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||
| Backport Requested: |
v3.6
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | Repl 2018-02-26 | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Linked BF Score: | 0 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
It's inherently racy to use initiate() with a high priority node other than node 0. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 27/Mar/18 ] |
|
Author: {'email': 'vesselina.ratcheva@10gen.com', 'name': 'Vesselina Ratcheva', 'username': 'vessy-mongodb'}Message: (cherry picked from commit fea4cfc5719897a82b2e1dd7b68f94fb3990228f) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 17/Feb/18 ] |
|
Author: {'email': 'vesselina.ratcheva@10gen.com', 'name': 'Vesselina Ratcheva', 'username': 'vessy-mongodb'}Message: |
| Comment by Spencer Brody (Inactive) [ 14/Feb/18 ] |
|
vesselina.ratcheva, can you take a crack at this on Friday? |