[SERVER-39813] Add the oldest required timestamp into server status Created: 25/Feb/19 Updated: 29/Oct/23 Resolved: 22/May/19 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Replication |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 4.1.12 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Gregory McKeon (Inactive) | Assignee: | Benety Goh |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | bigtxns_diagnostics, bigtxns_optional | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Execution Team 2019-06-03 | ||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Either in the repl or transaction section. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 22/May/19 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Benety Goh', 'email': 'benety@mongodb.com', 'username': 'benety'}Message: |
| Comment by Githook User [ 22/May/19 ] |
|
Author: {'email': 'benety@mongodb.com', 'name': 'Benety Goh', 'username': 'benety'}Message: |
| Comment by Benety Goh [ 22/May/19 ] |
|
Closing this ticket with the following two commits: |
| Comment by Daniel Gottlieb (Inactive) [ 16/Apr/19 ] |
|
Apologies for being late to the party judah.schvimer. I don't see a problem surfacing that value. Or, just in the interest of presenting you with options: if you don't care exactly which response sub-object it gets thrown in, the server status for storage (perhaps WT specific?) gets filled out here. |
| Comment by Judah Schvimer [ 04/Apr/19 ] |
|
For |
| Comment by Judah Schvimer [ 04/Apr/19 ] |
|
Doing a collection scan would be unacceptable for server status, however we cache the value here and could surface that value. daniel.gottlieb, do you see any problem with that? |
| Comment by Siyuan Zhou [ 04/Apr/19 ] |
|
judah.schvimer, given the change of how we store and get the oldest required timestamp, do we still want this with a transaction table scan? Is it acceptable to do a collection scan to get server status? Gating this with an option is possible. A similar question applies to |