[SERVER-40009] Set/honour initial sync flag at the early stages of initial sync Created: 07/Mar/19 Updated: 29/Oct/23 Resolved: 25/Jun/19 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Replication |
| Affects Version/s: | 4.0.6 |
| Fix Version/s: | 4.2.0-rc3, 4.0.13, 4.3.1 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Josef Ahmad | Assignee: | Jason Chan |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating System: | ALL | ||||||||||||||||
| Backport Requested: |
v4.2, v4.0, v3.6
|
||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Repl 2019-06-17, Repl 2019-07-01 | ||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||
| Case: | (copied to CRM) | ||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Symptoms: when the server is restarted at an early stage of the initial sync, the initial sync is unable to resume.
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Lawrence Tan (Inactive) [ 07/Aug/20 ] |
|
Would it be possible to fix this for 3.6 as well? We've also been seeing flaky test that appear to be related to this in CLOUDP-68939 |
| Comment by Githook User [ 13/Aug/19 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Jason Chan', 'username': 'jasonjhchan', 'email': 'jason.chan@10gen.com'}Message: (cherry picked from commit c0c64c95637f8f0700ac40e89dc39c30ec6f5f41) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 02/Jul/19 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Jason Chan', 'username': 'jasonjhchan', 'email': 'jason.chan@10gen.com'}Message: (cherry picked from commit c0c64c95637f8f0700ac40e89dc39c30ec6f5f41) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 25/Jun/19 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Jason Chan', 'email': 'jason.chan@10gen.com', 'username': 'jasonjhchan'}Message: |
| Comment by Judah Schvimer [ 12/Jun/19 ] |
|
Correct |
| Comment by Jason Chan [ 12/Jun/19 ] |
|
judah.schvimer The ticket says that this ticket affects version 4.0.6. However, since this issue exists in 4.2 and master, am I correct in assuming that this change should go in master and then backported to 4.2 and 4.0? |
| Comment by Judah Schvimer [ 11/Mar/19 ] |
|
cory.mintz, is this important for Atlas? |