[SERVER-43580] Consider allowing expressions in exclusion projections Created: 23/Sep/19 Updated: 06/Dec/22 |
|
| Status: | Backlog |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Querying |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Ian Boros | Assignee: | Backlog - Query Execution |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Execution
|
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
As part of PM-684, most (all?) all of the infrastructure for supporting expressions in exclusion projections will be done.
We should consider changing the projection language to allow exclusion projections with expressions. For example:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Ian Boros [ 31/Oct/19 ] |
|
Removing from the epic and flagging for re-triage per discussion with Dave. |
| Comment by Asya Kamsky [ 23/Sep/19 ] |
|
I have a stronger opinion on SERVER-391 which I've decided we should address somehow (not sure how) - this is not that different... |
| Comment by Ian Boros [ 23/Sep/19 ] |
|
asya Do you have a strong opinion on this? |