[SERVER-44646] Test oplog stone behavior with very very large oplogs Created: 14/Nov/19 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 20/Nov/19 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Storage |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Eric Milkie | Assignee: | Backlog - Storage Execution Team |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Storage Execution
|
||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
We have seen an instance where a very large oplog resulted in increasing memory usage (leak) – the suspicion is that the truncate call is somehow leaking memory. We should write a test that exercises very large truncate ranges and see if we can reproduce the behavior. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Eric Milkie [ 20/Nov/19 ] |
|
Closing in favor of |