[SERVER-45202] Improve Command alias infrastructure Created: 17/Dec/19 Updated: 29/Oct/23 Resolved: 23/Jan/20 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 4.3.3, 3.6.20, 4.2.10, 4.0.21 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Benjamin Caimano (Inactive) | Assignee: | Amirsaman Memaripour |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | neweng, save-for-sam | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||||||
| Backport Requested: |
v4.2, v4.0, v3.6
|
||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
We currently give each Command a name and an oldName (see here). The oldName is only used to register the command into a map. This limits our command infrastructure and makes it difficult to describe commands externally (e.g. via failpoints). We should do the following:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 28/Aug/20 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Amirsaman Memaripour', 'email': 'amirsaman.memaripour@10gen.com'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 3cd3a6da3fe0b6f022b721094bda0b97c3527d23) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 27/Aug/20 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Amirsaman Memaripour', 'email': 'amirsaman.memaripour@10gen.com'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 3cd3a6da3fe0b6f022b721094bda0b97c3527d23) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 26/Aug/20 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Amirsaman Memaripour', 'email': 'amirsaman.memaripour@10gen.com'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 3cd3a6da3fe0b6f022b721094bda0b97c3527d23) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 23/Jan/20 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Amirsaman Memaripour', 'email': 'amirsaman.memaripour@10gen.com'}Message: |