[SERVER-50281] Support splitting tasks differently in mainline vs patch builds Created: 12/Aug/20 Updated: 29/Oct/23 Resolved: 28/Oct/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Testing Infrastructure |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 5.2.0 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | David Bradford (Inactive) | Assignee: | David Bradford (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||
| Sprint: | DAG 2021-11-01 | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Linked BF Score: | 131 | ||||||||
| Story Points: | 2 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
Since getting results from mainline builds is usually doesn't have someone waiting for it like patch builds do, we may want to make different tradeoffs when splitting tasks in the maintain vs splitting tasks in patch builds. We are already treating dependencies differently for splitting tasks in patch builds vs mainline builds. So also applying that to the number of tasks split should be fairly straight-forward. As an evergreen server maintainer, AC:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Cristopher Stauffer [ 28/Oct/21 ] |
|
acm I don't think this changes comparability, but it doesn't improve the situation other than the project size bottleneck. I'm going to look at the results tonight and I think we can make a determination if stability or any other consequences emerge. We're opening a separate research ticket to revisit all of this approach. |
| Comment by Andrew Morrow (Inactive) [ 28/Oct/21 ] |
|
How does this affect the comparability of mainline builds versus patch builds? The mainline builds form the baseline results against which patch builds are evaluated. |
| Comment by Githook User [ 28/Oct/21 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'David Bradford', 'email': 'david.bradford@mongodb.com', 'username': 'dbradf'}Message: |