[SERVER-50934] Create concurrency suite that does tenant migrations in the background Created: 14/Sep/20 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 04/Jan/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Replication, Testing Infrastructure |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Judah Schvimer | Assignee: | Backlog - Replication Team |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | pm-1791_polish | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Replication
|
||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
This is ideally a small extension to |
| Comments |
| Comment by Esha Maharishi (Inactive) [ 14/Sep/20 ] |
|
I think it's high value despite the fuzzer concurrency suite since it might show us cases where tenant migrations are not transparent to an application. However, I think it might be worth using a real Atlas proxy to avoid implementing a lot of the proxy logic ourselves, so would be fine with waiting a while to do this depending on the timeline for using a real Atlas proxy in Evergreen. |
| Comment by Judah Schvimer [ 14/Sep/20 ] |
|
esha.maharishi, what do you think of the value here? robert.guo, what do you think of the difficulty/value here once we're already doing the linked tickets? |