[SERVER-51017] Add unittest for PrimaryOnlyService::Instance::interrupt Created: 17/Sep/20 Updated: 12/Sep/22 Resolved: 12/Sep/22 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Internal Code |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Cheahuychou Mao | Assignee: | Matt Diener (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Won't Fix | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | Sharding 2020-09-21, Service Arch 2022-09-05, Service Arch 2022-09-19 | ||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||
| Comments |
| Comment by Matt Diener (Inactive) [ 12/Sep/22 ] |
|
I'm closing this as won't fix. It's looking very very likely that we'll be using CancellationToken as the primary mechanism for cancellation in POS. The testing of CancellationToken should be done as part of its adoption. There is a scope document which needs to be written. Planning of this sort of change belongs there. |
| Comment by Lauren Lewis (Inactive) [ 21/Dec/21 ] |
|
We haven’t heard back from you in at least 1 year, so I'm going to close this ticket. If this is still an issue for you, please provide additional information and we will reopen the ticket. |
| Comment by Esha Maharishi (Inactive) [ 29/Sep/20 ] |
|
Putting this on the backlog since we may remove the interrupt() method altogether in favor of using cancelation tokens in Primary-Only Service under |