[SERVER-58854] Coverity analysis defect 120358: Missing break in switch Created: 26/Jul/21 Updated: 27/Oct/23 Resolved: 17/Sep/21 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Coverity Collector User | Assignee: | Backlog - Query Optimization |
| Resolution: | Gone away | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | coverity, neweng | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Optimization
|
| Operating System: | ALL |
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
Missing break in switch Execution falls through to the next case statement or default; this might indicate a common typo. Missing break statement between cases in switch statement |
| Comments |
| Comment by Kyle Suarez [ 17/Sep/21 ] |
|
Closing as "Gone Away" because Coverity says the original code that was flagged was "purged". |
| Comment by Kyle Suarez [ 26/Jul/21 ] |
|
In separate Coverity issues, the static analysis flagged each case of the larger switch statement as missing a break, so it would be good to address all of them at once as part of this ticket. |
| Comment by Kyle Suarez [ 26/Jul/21 ] |
|
FYI ted.tuckman, hana.pearlman |