[SERVER-59740] Add more end-to-end tests for time-series measurement indexes Created: 02/Sep/21 Updated: 27/Oct/23 Resolved: 24/Jan/22 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | David Percy | Assignee: | Backlog - Query Optimization |
| Resolution: | Gone away | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Optimization
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | QO 2021-10-04, QO 2021-11-29, QO 2021-12-13, QO 2021-12-27, QO 2022-01-10, QO 2022-01-24, QO 2022-02-07 | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
Let's make sure we have test coverage for various types of time-series queries that should use secondary indexes on measurements. Some index types didn't require any Query work, but we should confirm that the planner uses the indexes when available, and that the results are correct. |
| Comments |
| Comment by David Percy [ 02/Sep/21 ] |
|
One example we should look at is sparse indexes. This seems related to |