[SERVER-61100] Fix multiversion tests that assert last-lts/last-continuous incompatibility Created: 29/Oct/21 Updated: 29/Oct/23 Resolved: 30/Mar/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 7.0.0-rc0, 6.0.6 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Vesselina Ratcheva (Inactive) | Assignee: | Tausif Rahman (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Server Development Platform
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating System: | ALL | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Backport Requested: |
v6.1, v6.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Sprint: | DAG 2022-06-27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Story Points: | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
The 5.2 version bump revealed problems with the following tests:
The purpose of those tests is to demonstrate that ReplSetTest and ShardingTest disallow configurations that include both 'last-lts' and 'last-continuous' members at the same time. They will both need to be made compatible with the 5.2 release. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 03/Apr/23 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Tausif Rahman', 'email': 'tausif.rahman@mongodb.com', 'username': 'trahman1318'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 69430bd7847d16fc0b3572747da5aeb8cf5cf858) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 29/Mar/23 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Tausif Rahman', 'email': 'tausif.rahman@mongodb.com', 'username': 'trahman1318'}Message: |
| Comment by Tausif Rahman (Inactive) [ 07/Feb/23 ] |
|
It looks like this was resolved with I'm to close this out. If there are any concerns feel free to reach out vesselina.ratcheva@mongodb.com |
| Comment by Alex Neben [ 07/Feb/23 ] |
|
tausif.rahman@mongodb.com I am not sure what this or the backport is asking for. Can you see if this is something we should do? I would be happy to close no work if this is not something helpful. |