[SERVER-62965] Add a new passthrough suite for change stream with 'showExpandedEvents:true' Created: 25/Jan/22 Updated: 06/Dec/22 Resolved: 28/Mar/22 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Arun Banala | Assignee: | Backlog - Query Execution |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | pm1950-m5 | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Execution
|
| Participants: |
| Comments |
| Comment by Arun Banala [ 28/Mar/22 ] |
|
Ah sorry, yup |
| Comment by Kyle Suarez [ 28/Mar/22 ] |
|
In any case, I'll close this ticket as Won't Do and track the expanding testing in another ticket. |
| Comment by Kyle Suarez [ 28/Mar/22 ] |
|
^ I think you mean |
| Comment by Arun Banala [ 28/Mar/22 ] |
|
Yeah, this could be a lot of work. I'm okay with closing this as won't do. I was mainly concerned about not enough coverage for the rewrite logic, with flag off and flag on. We can strive to achieve that in |
| Comment by Bernard Gorman [ 26/Mar/22 ] |
|
kyle.suarez, arun.banala: not sure this is very practical, since it means that every pre-PM-1950 test would start seeing unexpected events. We'd have to set showExpandedEvents:true and then add a $match for only pre-1950 operationTypes, and then we'd have to exclude any tests written to work with post-1950 events. |