[SERVER-6901] db.printSlaveReplicationInfo() and db.printReplicationInfo() should be present in both rs.* and db.* Created: 30/Aug/12 Updated: 27/Oct/15 Resolved: 27/Aug/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Replication |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.2.0 |
| Fix Version/s: | 2.5.3 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Minor - P4 |
| Reporter: | William Zola | Assignee: | Kyle Erf |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | neweng, usability | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
The commands db.printSlaveReplicationInfo() and db.printReplicationInfo() are useful, but since they're part of db.* instead of rs.*, they're hard to find. Perhaps the information in the db.* commands could be included in the output of rs.status()? |
| Comments |
| Comment by auto [ 27/Aug/13 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'3rf', u'name': u'Kyle Erf', u'email': u'kyle.erf@10gen.com'}Message: Signed-off-by: Matt Kangas <matt.kangas@10gen.com> |
| Comment by William Zola [ 30/Aug/12 ] |
|
Once the changes are made, docs will need to be updated to match. |