[SERVER-72697] See if we can directly use the WT storage rather than cached Collection objects Created: 10/Jan/23 Updated: 14/Apr/23 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Geert Bosch | Assignee: | Backlog - Storage Execution Team |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Storage Execution
|
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
Two questions to answer:
If we don't have confidence in the first, we should not consider. If we know we cannot achieve the second, we should don't consider either. This ticket should probably focus on answering the first question. |