[SERVER-72697] See if we can directly use the WT storage rather than cached Collection objects Created: 10/Jan/23  Updated: 14/Apr/23

Status: Open
Project: Core Server
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Task Priority: Major - P3
Reporter: Geert Bosch Assignee: Backlog - Storage Execution Team
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Assigned Teams:
Storage Execution
Participants:

 Description   

Two questions to answer:

  • If we don't have a catalog cache (CollectionCatalog), but always read/write from/to the durable mdb_catalog, can we have a significant reduction in complexity?
  • Can we get OK performance by always going to the durable catalog?

If we don't have confidence in the first, we should not consider. If we know we cannot achieve the second, we should don't consider either.

This ticket should probably focus on answering the first question.


Generated at Thu Feb 08 06:22:33 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.7.1#970001-sha1:2222b88b221c4928ef0de3161136cc90c8356a66.