[SERVER-72709] Should dropDatabase remove the views collection first to maintain the same oplog entry order for time-series namespace as dropCollection? Created: 10/Jan/23 Updated: 19/Jan/23 Resolved: 19/Jan/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Dianna Hohensee (Inactive) | Assignee: | Dianna Hohensee (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Storage Execution
|
||||||||
| Sprint: | Execution Team 2023-01-23 | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
The dropCollection and dropDatabase cmds write oplog entries for time-series collections in different orders. dropCollection writes dropDatabase writes Discussion on slack led to the thought that we tried to ensure an order, such that the buckets collection may remain without the view, but not the other way around. But there's uncertainty as to whether or not it matters. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Dianna Hohensee (Inactive) [ 19/Jan/23 ] |
|
This was spun off during the investigation of |