[SERVER-73249] Investigate behavior for requesting IS when IX is held Created: 24/Jan/23 Updated: 27/Oct/23 Resolved: 31/Jan/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Fausto Leyva (Inactive) | Assignee: | Backlog - Storage Execution Team |
| Resolution: | Works as Designed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Storage Execution
|
||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
IX is not covered by S or IS. If we ban all lock upgrades how will we treat requests for IS locks when IX is held? |
| Comments |
| Comment by Fausto Leyva (Inactive) [ 24/Jan/23 ] |
|
IX should cover IS lock modes. If we currently have an IX lock, we should keep it as it is stronger than the IS. |