[SERVER-74250] Rename slowOplogSamplingReads to slowCollectionSamplingReads Created: 22/Feb/23 Updated: 28/Feb/23 |
|
| Status: | Backlog |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Jordi Olivares Provencio | Assignee: | Backlog - Storage Execution Team |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | neweng, tech-debt | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Storage Execution
|
||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
For testing there is a failpoint called slowOplogSamplingReads that can't be currently renamed to a more generic term until 7.0 is released due to multiversion testing. The term should be something more generic called slowCollectionSamplingReads. The places affected by this have been mamrked with TODOs in the code with this server ticket. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Haley Connelly [ 23/Feb/23 ] |
|
Good point, sorry I misread it was a server parameter |
| Comment by Jordi Olivares Provencio [ 23/Feb/23 ] |
|
This is a failpoint rename so I don't expect users to actually interact with it |
| Comment by Haley Connelly [ 23/Feb/23 ] |
|
Has there been discussion about this with product? I'm curious as to whether we want to keep our oplog sampling at a separate granularity |