[SERVER-76714] Consider whether reshardDoneCatchUp change event should be recorded against the original namespace Created: 01/May/23 Updated: 02/May/23 |
|
| Status: | Backlog |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Bernard Gorman | Assignee: | Backlog - Query Execution |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Execution
|
| Participants: |
| Description |
|
Currently, and unlike reshardBegin, the reshardDoneCatchUp event's namespace is the internal resharding namespace. Consider whether the source no-op oplog entry should instead be written with the original collection's namespace, for consistency across these related events. |