[SERVER-78525] Update jstests/noPassthrough/metadata_size_estimate.js to use a smaller document size Created: 28/Jun/23 Updated: 29/Oct/23 Resolved: 07/Jul/23 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 7.1.0-rc0, 7.0.1, 5.0.20, 6.0.9 |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Mihai Andrei | Assignee: | Mihai Andrei |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||
| Assigned Teams: |
Query Execution
|
||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||
| Backport Requested: |
v7.0, v6.0, v5.0
|
||||
| Sprint: | QE 2023-07-10 | ||||
| Participants: | |||||
| Description |
|
While working on BACKPORT-15765, it was discovered that using documents of 4KB (instead of 64KB) reproduced a customer issue that was resolved by that backport (originating from |
| Comments |
| Comment by Githook User [ 16/Aug/23 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Mihai Andrei', 'email': 'mihai.andrei@mongodb.com', 'username': 'mtandrei'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 7c5ef590cb753b32331a4f1332a87bfdcbe7a781) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 03/Aug/23 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Mihai Andrei', 'email': 'mihai.andrei@mongodb.com', 'username': 'mtandrei'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 7c5ef590cb753b32331a4f1332a87bfdcbe7a781) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 03/Aug/23 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Mihai Andrei', 'email': 'mihai.andrei@mongodb.com', 'username': 'mtandrei'}Message: (cherry picked from commit 7c5ef590cb753b32331a4f1332a87bfdcbe7a781) |
| Comment by Githook User [ 07/Jul/23 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Mihai Andrei', 'email': 'mihai.andrei@mongodb.com', 'username': 'mtandrei'}Message: |
| Comment by Mihai Andrei [ 28/Jun/23 ] |
|
Absolutely |
| Comment by David Storch [ 28/Jun/23 ] |
|
mihai.andrei@mongodb.com are you willing to take this ticket given the context that you have on the issue and the fact that it should (hopefully) be just a one-line test change? |