[SERVER-80966] Investigate rolesInfo response in multitenancy envrionment Created: 11/Sep/23 Updated: 23/Jan/24 |
|
| Status: | Backlog |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Sophia Tan | Assignee: | Backlog - Security Team |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | ntdi_must_have, ntdi_releasability | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Assigned Teams: |
Server Security
|
| Participants: | |
| Story Points: | 2 |
| Description |
|
In multitenancy envrionment, do we need to include tenant prefix in the "db" field of "rolesInfo" command response? This is not covered by design doc. This ticket is opened to investigate what's the expected "db" in the response of "rolesInfo" command. |