[SERVER-8253] MongoD is spamming with hundreds of gigabytes of logs Created: 21/Jan/13 Updated: 11/Jul/16 Resolved: 28/May/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Anton V. Volokhov | Assignee: | James Wahlin |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Operating System: | ALL | ||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||
| Description |
|
Hi! Mon Jan 21 07:22:07 [rsSync] SocketException: remote: 192.168.1.101:27017 error: 9001 socket exception [0] server [192.168.1.101:27017] Logfile raised to 200gb size in 6 hours, with 0 logLevel. |
| Comments |
| Comment by James Wahlin [ 28/May/13 ] |
|
Resolving ticket. Anton, feel free to reopen with any further questions. Thanks, |
| Comment by Eric Milkie [ 28/May/13 ] |
|
Replication batch size is unrelated to ulimits. |
| Comment by Anton V. Volokhov [ 28/May/13 ] |
|
Thanks! |
| Comment by James Wahlin [ 28/May/13 ] |
|
Hi Anton, I have created Let me know if you have any further questions for this ticket, otherwise let's close out given your initial problem appears to have been ulimit related and we have a new ticket for the replication batch size statement. Thanks, |
| Comment by Anton V. Volokhov [ 24/May/13 ] |
|
We use more frequent logrotate. |
| Comment by James Wahlin [ 24/May/13 ] |
|
Hi Anton, Sorry about the delay on this. The "replication batch size" message in 2.2.2 is only printed at log level one. If you change logging to level 0 this will go away. Can you give me an idea on your current status? Can we still be of help on this? Thanks, |
| Comment by Anton V. Volokhov [ 24/Jan/13 ] |
|
one more issue with logging. |
| Comment by Anton V. Volokhov [ 21/Jan/13 ] |
|
We are making dump of a whole cluster and use it only if whole cluster is corrupted. We hoped, that secondaries can recover without any manual tuning. |
| Comment by Gregor Macadam [ 21/Jan/13 ] |
|
Hi |
| Comment by Anton V. Volokhov [ 21/Jan/13 ] |
|
Initial sync is in progress now, but it crawls slowly. |
| Comment by Anton V. Volokhov [ 21/Jan/13 ] |
|
Yes, connectivity is ok. |
| Comment by Eliot Horowitz (Inactive) [ 21/Jan/13 ] |
|
Seems like there is a networking issue? |