[SERVER-8378] indexbg1.js failures Created: 29/Jan/13 Updated: 11/Jul/16 Resolved: 29/Oct/13 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Index Maintenance, Testing Infrastructure |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.3.2 |
| Fix Version/s: | 2.5.4 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Eric Milkie | Assignee: | Matt Dannenberg |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | build-failure, buildbot | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Operating System: | ALL | ||||||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
slowWeekly/indexbg1.js is stalling on the first write (which is a remove) |
| Comments |
| Comment by auto [ 29/Oct/13 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'erh', u'name': u'Eliot Horowitz', u'email': u'eliot@10gen.com'}Message: |
| Comment by auto [ 18/Oct/13 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'milkie', u'name': u'Eric Milkie', u'email': u'milkie@10gen.com'}Message: |
| Comment by Eric Milkie [ 15/Oct/13 ] |
|
Yes we should as soon as we cut 2.5.3. |
| Comment by Matt Kangas [ 14/Oct/13 ] |
|
milkie still need to turn this test back on? |
| Comment by Eric Milkie [ 30/Aug/13 ] |
|
Need to keep this open until we revert some of the changes I made to this test, so that we can test doing deletes while a bg index is running. |
| Comment by auto [ 30/Aug/13 ] |
|
Author: {u'username': u'milkie', u'name': u'Eric Milkie', u'email': u'milkie@10gen.com'}Message: I needed to comment out the 'remove' part because the current deleteObject code gets bullied if |
| Comment by Matt Kangas [ 30/Aug/13 ] |
|
Still seen today, August 30. osx-108-dur-off slow_weekly_tests : indexbg1.js "assert failed : unable to run checks in parallel with index creation" "assert failed : unable to run checks in parallel with index creation" |
| Comment by Eric Milkie [ 30/Aug/13 ] |
|
Yes. |
| Comment by Matt Kangas [ 30/Aug/13 ] |
|
milkie, is |
| Comment by Eric Milkie [ 29/Jan/13 ] |
|
This does not appear to be a regression from 2.2 (the test has the same issues there) |