[SERVER-85] should we use smaller files for the repl and sharding tests? Created: 01/Jun/09 Updated: 02/Aug/18 Resolved: 09/Dec/09 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Replication |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | 1.3.0 |
| Type: | Task | Priority: | Trivial - P5 |
| Reporter: | Eliot Horowitz (Inactive) | Assignee: | Gregory McKeon (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Participants: |
| Comments |
| Comment by auto [ 09/Dec/09 ] |
|
Author: {'name': 'Aaron', 'email': 'aaron@10gen.com'}Message: |
| Comment by Eliot Horowitz (Inactive) [ 09/Dec/09 ] |
|
yes - but i think i started abstracting out some stuff into a ReplTest class, so should look into that. |
| Comment by Aaron Staple [ 09/Dec/09 ] |
|
In a couple of very unscientific tests, Eliot's smallfiles change reduced the repl2.js time from 55 sec to 45 sec on my machine. Should I implement for all the repl tests? |
| Comment by Eliot Horowitz (Inactive) [ 09/Oct/09 ] |
|
added a --smalfiles option for this - will try |
| Comment by Eliot Horowitz (Inactive) [ 11/Aug/09 ] |
|
helped a little, and is much nicer to the drives |
| Comment by Aaron Staple [ 11/Aug/09 ] |
|
I disabled prealloc, let's see how it goes |
| Comment by Eliot Horowitz (Inactive) [ 30/Jul/09 ] |
|
yes - just for speed. disabling prealloc for repl/pairing/sharding tests would be good |
| Comment by Aaron Staple [ 30/Jul/09 ] |
|
You mean to make the tests faster? One simple way to do this would be to disable file preallocation for repl/pairing tests. |