[SERVER-85117] Write and edit aggregation documentation changes and additions Created: 05/Aug/15  Updated: 12/Jan/24  Resolved: 30/Oct/15

Status: Closed
Project: Core Server
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Task Priority: Major - P3
Reporter: Ian Whalen (Inactive) Assignee: Charlie Swanson
Resolution: Done Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified

Sprint: QuInt 8 08/28/15, Quint 9 09/18/15, QuInt A (10/12/15), QuInt B (11/02/15)
Participants:

 Description   


 Comments   
Comment by Kay Kim (Inactive) [ 30/Oct/15 ]

Yup – you can reassign or close because once it's in cr, I know how to nag people till they actually review (of course, Charlie has always been prompt so I'll have all this pent up nagging to do ...)

Comment by Barrie Segal [ 30/Oct/15 ]

kay.kim you got me. can we reassign?

Comment by Kay Kim (Inactive) [ 30/Oct/15 ]

Just FYI, if people are doing JIRA housekeeping, so, basically, Charlie's finished for this rotation project and the code reviews will come under regular code review process.

Comment by Kay Kim (Inactive) [ 30/Oct/15 ]

Your understanding is correct. Somehow the email about the feedback doc being available got lost in transit and wasn't aware of it. I'll take a look now.

Comment by Charlie Swanson [ 30/Oct/15 ]

My understanding is that I was to come up with suggestions and for Kay to incorporate them into the relevant pieces of the documentation (this is how the release notes worked). If that's still the case, this is waiting for Kay to do so and open some code reviews.

I am happy to open code reviews for Kay to review as well if that is preferred.

cc kay.kim

Comment by Barrie Segal [ 30/Oct/15 ]

charlie.swanson redbeard0531 is this good to go?

Comment by Charlie Swanson [ 22/Oct/15 ]

Ok, feedback is in the attached document. I'm not sure what the best practice would be going forward, but I think commenting/suggesting on the doc until we all think it looks good and then starting code reviews?

cc redbeard0531, if you could do a quick skim of my suggestions it would be much appreciated. Particularly Aggregation Pipeline Limits (which we already discussed a bit) and $sample.

Comment by Barrie Segal [ 21/Oct/15 ]

charlie.swanson thank you!

Comment by Charlie Swanson [ 21/Oct/15 ]

barrie, yes! I am planning on doing this in Quint B. I'll likely start later today or tomorrow. Just working on wrapping up one other ticket first.

Comment by Barrie Segal [ 20/Oct/15 ]

ian.whalen charlie.swanson Want to check up on this. Is this still for QuInt B?

cc kay.kim

Comment by Ian Whalen (Inactive) [ 20/Aug/15 ]

Talk to kay.kim@10gen.com before starting on this just to make sure you've got a mutually agreed upon understanding of scope.

Generated at Thu Feb 08 06:56:52 UTC 2024 using Jira 9.7.1#970001-sha1:2222b88b221c4928ef0de3161136cc90c8356a66.