[SERVER-9979] Don't wait for balancer to start when calling startBalancer from the shell Created: 20/Jun/13 Updated: 25/Jun/15 Resolved: 20/May/15 |
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | Core Server |
| Component/s: | Shell |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major - P3 |
| Reporter: | Antoine Girbal | Assignee: | Andrew Morrow (Inactive) |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| Backwards Compatibility: | Fully Compatible | ||||||||||||
| Participants: | |||||||||||||
| Description |
|
I've hit that problem many times with customer when drafting maintenance procedure: use stopBalancer() to stop and setBalancerState(true) to start. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Andrew Morrow (Inactive) [ 20/May/15 ] |
|
The documentation currently states that one should use setBalancerState(true) instead of sh.startBalancer(), so this ticket is being closed as "works as designed". Please feel free to re-open this ticket if you have any further questions. |