Uploaded image for project: 'Documentation'
  1. Documentation
  2. DOCS-11702

Docs for SERVER-5461: Add syncSourceHost field to replSetGetStatus output

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major - P3
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 4.0.0-rc0, 3.6.6, 3.4.16
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:

      Description

      Description:

      We're deprecating the old "syncingTo" field in 4.0. We should remove references to this field in our docs, and replace them with references to "syncSourceHost"

      Scope of changes:

      • replSetGetStatus
        • add new field
        • deprecate old field
        • update sample output
        • update missing output fields
          • syncSourceId (DOCS-11699)
          • top level syncingTo , "syncSourceHost" : "", "syncSourceId" : -1
          • lastStableCheckpointTimestamp (DOCS-11598)
      • 4.0.txt
      • 4.0-compatibility.txt

      Impact to other docs outside of this product:

      None

      MVP:

      Resources:

      Engineering Ticket Description:

      The 'syncingTo' field in replSetGetStatus output is ambiguously named. To make it clear what direction the replication is going in, we will add a new field "syncSourceHost" with the same data as the existing "syncingTo". In a later version we will remove "syncingTo".

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              Assignee:
              kay.kim Kay Kim (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              kay.kim Kay Kim (Inactive)
              Participants:
              Last commenter:
              Kay Kim Kay Kim (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Days since reply:
                3 years, 23 weeks, 5 days ago
                Date of 1st Reply: