Details
-
Improvement
-
Resolution: Done
-
Minor - P4
-
None
-
*Location*: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/tutorial/model-data-for-atomic-operations/
*User-Agent*: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.81 Safari/537.36
*Referrer*: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14967940/transactions-in-mongodb
*Screen Resolution*: 1400 x 1050
*repo*: docs
*source*: tutorial/model-data-for-atomic-operations
*Location*: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/tutorial/model-data-for-atomic-operations/ *User-Agent*: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.81 Safari/537.36 *Referrer*: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14967940/transactions-in-mongodb *Screen Resolution*: 1400 x 1050 *repo*: docs *source*: tutorial/model-data-for-atomic-operations
Description
There is not a check-in example.
If we indeed go on with the example, we will end up with having a typical SQL table embedded within mongoDB.
I would try to find a different example for atomicity, where noSQL makes sense.