-
Type:
Task
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
ASAN:SIGSEGV
[2020/05/28 11:47:48.986] =================================================================
[2020/05/28 11:47:48.986] ==8612==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0000000000a0 (pc 0x0000006944a4 sp 0x7fff4c9f0760 bp 0x7fff4c9f0910 T0)
[2020/05/28 11:47:49.414] #0 0x6944a3 in request_destroy /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/mock_server/request.c:702
[2020/05/28 11:47:49.419] #1 0x6ecce2 in test_bulk_error_unordered /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/test-mongoc-bulk.c:341
[2020/05/28 11:47:49.421] #2 0xbcf2e8 in TestSuite_RunTest /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/TestSuite.c:597
[2020/05/28 11:47:49.422] #3 0xbcbb26 in TestSuite_RunNamed /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/TestSuite.c:924
[2020/05/28 11:47:49.422] #4 0xbc9c30 in TestSuite_Run /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/TestSuite.c:968
[2020/05/28 11:47:49.426] #5 0x6cfa3d in main /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/test-libmongoc.c:2636
[2020/05/28 11:47:51.322] #6 0x7fbd2bb39f44 in __libc_start_main /build/eglibc-xkFqqE/eglibc-2.19/csu/libc-start.c:287
[2020/05/28 11:47:51.322] #7 0x4a0c4c in _start (/data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/test-libmongoc+0x4a0c4c)
[2020/05/28 11:47:51.323] AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
[2020/05/28 11:47:51.323] SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV /data/mci/a9ea0d25ec7dfb8e1a403ef2bc183132/mongoc/src/libmongoc/tests/mock_server/request.c:702 request_destroy
[2020/05/28 11:47:51.323] ==8612==ABORTING
[2020/05/28 11:47:51.348] { "status": "fail", "test_file": "/BulkOperation/error/unordered", "seed": "1389885282", "start": 903.411806, "end": 939.539880, "elapsed": 36.128074 },
Hypothesis: Though the logs indicate a segfault, I suspect request is just NULL here because no command was sent. The test sets sockettimeoutms to 500. I suspect that is causing a network timeout error if the test is slow. I am not sure if a small sockettimeoutms is necessary for this test.
- duplicates
-
-
- Backlog
-