/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/errors/scripts/extract-errors.ts
  27:29  error  Don't use `String` as a type. Use string instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/errors/src/index.ts
  20:22  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  22:72  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  32:58  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  38:43  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  49:58  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  55:58  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  61:58  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  67:43  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  73:43  error  Don't use `Object` as a type. The `Object` type actually means "any non-nullish value", so it is marginally better than `unknown`.
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/async-rewriter2/src/stages/uncatchable-exceptions.ts
  13:21  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/shell-api/src/collection.ts
  2006:10  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  2007:13  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/shell-api/src/decorators.ts
  198:40  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  198:51  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  199:32  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  317:7   error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  451:44  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  597:51  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  605:50  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  647:65  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  667:4   error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  706:60  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  780:4   error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  797:43  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  813:46  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  821:60  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  835:65  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  836:33  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  845:49  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/shell-api/src/explainable.ts
  250:10  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  251:13  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/shell-api/src/helpers.ts
  1073:40  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1087:37  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1087:51  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1088:37  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1088:51  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1088:65  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1094:13  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1095:13  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1096:13  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1097:13  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1099:35  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  1099:51  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/shell-api/src/shell-bson.ts
   46:23  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  211:19  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/cli-repl/src/config-directory.spec.ts
  19:16  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  20:23  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  21:20  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/node-runtime-worker-thread/src/child-process-proxy.ts
  76:44  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/node-runtime-worker-thread/src/index.d.ts
  18:38  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  19:41  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  26:11  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/node-runtime-worker-thread/src/rpc.spec.ts
  60:38  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/node-runtime-worker-thread/src/rpc.ts
   24:28  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
   24:43  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
   25:20  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
   26:35  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape                                  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  174:43  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/e2e-tests/test/e2e-auth.spec.ts
  11:46  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  24:46  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types
  48:62  error  Don't use `Function` as a type. The `Function` type accepts any function-like value.
It provides no type safety when calling the function, which can be a common source of bugs.
It also accepts things like class declarations, which will throw at runtime as they will not be called with `new`.
If you are expecting the function to accept certain arguments, you should explicitly define the function shape  @typescript-eslint/ban-types

/Users/leroux.bodenstein/mongo/mongosh/packages/browser-repl/src/components/utils/expandable.tsx
  12:24  error  Don't use `{}` as a type. `{}` actually means "any non-nullish value".
- If you want a type meaning "any object", you probably want `object` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "any value", you probably want `unknown` instead.
- If you want a type meaning "empty object", you probably want `Record<string, never>` instead.
- If you really want a type meaning "any non-nullish value", you probably want `NonNullable<unknown>` instead  @typescript-eslint/ban-types