Consider reintroducing a default generic type for Collection

ExportXMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Unknown
    • 4.0.0
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • Rust Drivers
    • Hide

      1. What would you like to communicate to the user about this feature?
      2. Would you like the user to see examples of the syntax and/or executable code and its output?
      3. Which versions of the driver/connector does this apply to?

      Show
      1. What would you like to communicate to the user about this feature? 2. Would you like the user to see examples of the syntax and/or executable code and its output? 3. Which versions of the driver/connector does this apply to?
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      The Collection type used to have a default generic type of Document. We removed this to encourage users to define and use their own data types. However, this can be inconvenient when calling a collection method for which the data type is irrelevant (e.g. drop). We should consider reintroducing a default generic type, likely either Document or RawDocumentBuf.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Isabel Atkinson
            None
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: