Consider reintroducing a default generic type for Collection

XMLWordPrintableJSON

    • Type: Improvement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: Unknown
    • 4.0.0
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • None
    • None
    • Rust Drivers
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

      The Collection type used to have a default generic type of Document. We removed this to encourage users to define and use their own data types. However, this can be inconvenient when calling a collection method for which the data type is irrelevant (e.g. drop). We should consider reintroducing a default generic type, likely either Document or RawDocumentBuf.

            Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Isabel Atkinson
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: