-
Type:
Task
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Priority:
Major - P3
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
None
-
Query Optimization
-
None
-
3
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Currently:
- all the PROJECTION nodes have the same cost, which I believe is incorrect. PROJECTION_COVERED should not be doing any extensive computations, it just converts the index entries into documents
- the cost of the projection nodes does not depend on the number of columns projected.
- the cost of PROJECTION is about the same as the cost of the COLLSCAN, which seems incorrect.
Generally, the costs should be such that an IXSCAN + PROJECTION_COVERED should always win on the basis of cost.